August 5, 2015
Memorandum for: Matt Williams
Subject: Letting the pitcher bat in close games
No, I’m not going to blame you for tonight’s loss. The pitchers have to pitch and the hitters have to hit.
But there is one managerial mistake that I’m not going to let slip by. It’s the middle innings, a close game, and the starters’ pitch count is starting to get up there. He’s due to bat and are wondering whether you should you lift him for a pinch hitter.
Simply ask yourself whether, in the next inning, the pitcher were to allow the leadoff hitter to get aboard, you’re going to lift him for a reliever? If the answer is yes, please… PLEASE send in the pinch hitter now. It’s just a really poor percentage move not to use your pinch hitter in this situation.
You’re not the only manager to make this mistake, but in that situation the value of a pinch hitter is just much greater than the value of trying to stretch one more inning from your starter.
The deadline for all-star voting is Thursday, and the teams will be announced soon. To figure out which Nationals deserve to be on the all-star team, each year I put together an NL all-star team. For the last two years, I’ve used a systematic methodology based on statistics.
I won’t go through all the details of the methodology here (you can read the other article if you’re interested), but the main idea is that I give quite a bit of weight to both this season and last season’s performance, plus a little bit of weight to career performance. I want to avoid selecting players who just hit a hot streak for half a season. My method does allow for a few exceptional players to make the team based on a single season of play (Joc Pederson makes my team), but generally I’m looking for those who’ve played very well for at least a year and a half.
Here’s my 2015 all-star team. For position players, I show their weighted runs created (wRC+) over the last season and a half in parentheses; for pitchers I show their ERA– and FIP–:
National League – Starters
C – Buster Posey – Giants (143)
1B – Paul Goldschmidt – Diamondbacks (171)
2B – Dee Gordon – Marlins (108)
3B – Todd Frazier – Reds (136)
SS – Jhonny Peralta – Cardinals (125)
LF – Giancarlo Stanton – Marlins (157) – on DL, replaced by:
LF – Joc Pederson – Dodgers (146)
CF – Andrew McCutchen – Pirates (160)
RF – Bryce Harper – Nationals (159)
DH –Anthony Rizzo – Cubs (159)
SP – Max Scherzer – Nationals (69; 69)
Reserves
C – Jonathan Lucroy – Brewers (118)
C – Derek Norris – Padres (114)
1B – Adrian Gonzalez – Dodgers (134)
2B – Joe Panik – Giants (125)
3B – Nolan Arenado – Rockies (121)
3B – Matt Carpenter – Cardinals (122)
SS – Troy Tulowitzki – Rockies (146)
SS – Brandon Crawford – Giants (112)
OF – A.J. Pollock – Diamondbacks (126)
OF – Jason Heyward – Cardinals (110)
OF – Justin Upton – Padres (133)
OF – Carlos Gomez – Brewers (125)
DH – Freddie Freeman – Braves (141)– on DL, replaced by:
DH – Joey Votto – Reds (139)
SP – Clayton Kershaw – Dodgers (63; 56)
SP – Zack Greinke – Dodgers (67; 80)
SP – Johnny Cueto – Reds (65; 87)
SP – Cole Hamels – Phillies (73; 85)
SP – Jacob deGrom – Mets (70; 71)
SP – Shelby Miller – Braves (86; 111)
RP – Aroldis Chapman – Reds (53; 34)
RP – Trevor Rosenthal – Cardinals (65; 76)
RP – Jonathan Papelbon – Phillies (54; 69)
RP – Kenley Jansen – Dodgers (67; 46)
RP – Francisco Rodriguez – Brewers (65; 100)
Shelby Miller and Jacob deGrom made my team because of the requirement that every team be represented; they’ve been good, but my statistical system would have picked A.J. Burnett and Jake Arrieta ahead of them.
So there are only two Nationals on my team—the best overall player (Bryce Harper) and the best pitcher (Max Scherzer). Several others came close—Jordan Zimmermann and Drew Storen (and Anthony Rendon if he hadn’t been on the disabled list), but Harper and Scherzer were the only Nats to make the cut this time.
Joe Ross pitched his third major league start, an 11-K, 1-run gem against the Pirates. His first three starts have been quite impressive. Among starting pitchers with at least 20 innings pitched, here are the leaders in strikeout-to-walk ratio:
| Name | Team | IP | K% | BB% | K/BB |
| Joe Ross | Nationals | 20.1 | 28.8% | 2.5% | 11.50 |
| Max Scherzer | Nationals | 93.1 | 30.9% | 3.8% | 8.07 |
| Michael Pineda | Yankees | 81.1 | 25.8% | 3.3% | 7.91 |
| Bartolo Colon | Mets | 86.0 | 18.7% | 2.5% | 7.56 |
| Brandon McCarthy | Dodgers | 23.0 | 30.9% | 4.3% | 7.25 |
And here are the leaders in fielding-independent pitching (FIP):
| Name | Team | IP | ERA | xFIP | FIP |
| Joe Ross | Nationals | 20.1 | 2.66 | 2.10 | 1.14 |
| Adam Wainwright | Cardinals | 25.0 | 1.44 | 2.92 | 2.03 |
| Max Scherzer | Nationals | 93.1 | 1.93 | 2.76 | 2.04 |
| Chris Archer | Rays | 95.0 | 2.18 | 2.35 | 2.14 |
| Chris Sale | White Sox | 88.2 | 2.74 | 2.42 | 2.23 |
Well, we all know we shouldn’t rely too much on statistics for pitchers who’ve only faced 80 major league batters (though pitcher strikeout rates do stabilize with pretty small samples). But going as much by what my eyes tell me as the statistics, I think there’s a good chance that Ross may prove to be a better pitcher than either Gio Gonzalez or Doug Fister over the remainder of this season. I think the team has its best chance of winning if they let him stay on the team, rather than sending him back to Harrisburg. Let him stay; if it turns out that these last three starts have been a fluke, we can always send him down later. But give him a chance to pitch for us now and prove the doubters wrong.
How would we use him? Although he could be sent to the bullpen, my own preference is to use him as a starter. While that might mean sending Fister to the bullpen, I think a better option would be to use him in a modified 6-man rotation.
How would that work? Assign Ross to pitch once a week—for example, he starts every Saturday. The other pitchers would pitch on their regular rotation, but they’d get an extra day’s rest when it’s Ross’s turn to pitch. Why do that rather than just plug him into a 5-man rotation? It comes down to work load and innings limits.
Ross has never pitched more than 122 innings or faced more than 524 batters in a season. Most teams don’t want to increase that work load more than about 30 innings (or 25%) in a season. He’s faced 286 batters so far this season. If we want to limit him to about 650 batters over the rest of the season, that would work out to about 15 more starts at about 24 batters per start. I proposed a similar once-a-week schedule for Stephen Strasburg the year of his shutdown; Tango Tiger proposed a similar schedule on his blog.
Maybe Ross will be great; maybe just good; or maybe he’ll need more time in the minors. But given the disappointing state of the Nationals rotation other than Max Scherzer, let’s give him a chance.
After 44 games played, the Nats are a little past the quarter season mark. Let’s take a look at their performance. My benchmark is what we would have expected from the team and from each player.
The team is in first place by 2-1/2 games with a 26-18 record, a .591 winning percentage, on pace for 96 wins. If you prefer Pythagorean winning percentage, their 212 runs scored and 187 runs allowed are consistent with a .562 winning percentage, or a 25-19 record so far. I think it’s fair to say that’s about how the team was expected to perform. Of course, it overlooks their horrendous 7-13 start, as well as their 19-5 record since April 28.
Their offense has been a little better than expected, with a .265/.336/.432 slash line and their .334 wOBA for their non-pitchers ranking 4th in MLB. But offsetting the good performance of their position player’s offense has been worse-than-expected defense, so I’d rate their position players performance overall as about the same as expected.
Of course, every group has individuals who surprise. On the upside, the really big surprise, of course, has been Bryce Harper. With his .326/.464/.729 slash line, he leads the majors in on-base percentage, slugging percentage, and with an fWAR of 3.1, leads the majors in wins above replacement. While we all expected Bryce to play at an all-star level, for the early part of this season he’s made the leap to MVP-level performance. Furthermore, the leap in walks and improved patience and pitch recognition suggest that the improvement may be permanent. No, I’m not expecting a .729 slugging percentage for the season, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see him end with 40+ home runs and an OBP above .400.
The other big positive surprise has been Danny Espinosa. With Anthony Rendon out due to injury, Espinosa has made up the difference with his unexpected .261/.359/.459 slash line and 1.0 fWAR. That was quite a step up from his .200/.255/.326 slash line over 2013–14. He’s also contributed with the glove.
Offsetting the positive surprises are the negative ones. The big one is Jayson Werth, whose .208/.294/.287 slash line and –0.6 fWAR is unprecedented in his career. Coming back from injury, it appears that he rushed back too soon, and over his first 19 games back (from April 13 to May 4) hit only .176/.247/.203. From May 8 to May 15, he hit a more respectable .296/.412/.519 over 34 plate appearances, before he went on the DL again after hurting his wrist.
We’ve already mentioned Anthony Rendon, who is a disappointment in the sense that we were expecting a lot from him and he hasn’t been able to play due to various injuries. The other player I’ll describe as a disappointment is Ian Desmond, whose .246/299/.392 slash line and 0.3 fWAR are worse than expected, and whose defensive miscues have also hurt the team.
Turning to pitching, I’ll mention that opinions on the team’s performance–especially that of the starting pitchers, is likely to vary depending on how much weight you give to fielding independent metrics such as FIP (or fWAR, which is based on FIP), and how much you give to traditional metrics such as ERA, RA/9, and rWAR or RA9-WAR, which are based on RA/9. According to FIP and fWAR, the Nationals starters are the best in baseball, but according to RA/9, their starters’ 4.86 ranks 25th among MLB rotations.
The one individual starter about whom there is no question is Max Scherzer. His 2.02 FIP is lowest among qualified major league pitchers, and his 1.67 ERA is fourth lowest. He’s started the season as a contender for the NL Cy Young Award.
Offsetting Scherzer’s strong performance have been major disappointments in the performance of Stephen Strasburg and Doug Fister. Strasburg’s 6.50 ERA is second highest among qualified MLB pitchers, even though his 3.65 FIP is better than the league average of 3.90. Even his better-than-average FIP, however, is a disappointment compared to his career marks. Coming into the season, his career FIP had been 2.84 and his career ERA had been 3.02, while for 2014 his FIP had been 2.94 and his ERA had been 3.14. Fister’s season hasn’t been quite so extreme, but his 4.31 ERA and 4.69 FIP are significantly worse than his averages over the last three seasons, 3.22 for ERA and 3.51 for FIP.
In the bullpen, Drew Storen has had a surprisingly good performance, with 13 saves and only one blown save, a 0.98 ERA, and a 1.28 FIP. Furthermore, 7 of his saves have preserved one-run leads. The rest of the bullpen has been pretty much about what was expected, which was sort of an average major-league bullpen.
The Nats have been in the somewhat unusual situation where most of their negative surprises have been offset by positive ones. Some regression is expected, but it doesn’t fundamentally change the prospect that this looks like a really good team.
I know I’m late to this discussion. I’m in the camp that Bryce Harper, Matt Williams, and umpire Marvin Hudson all shared in the blame. Since I don’t know what Harper said to Hudson, I don’t know whether he deserved his ejection.
I did want to make one point about Hudson’s actions that I’m not sure I’ve seen in other commentary. I think that MLB ought to instruct umpires never to stop a game to talk to, or argue with a manager or coach in the dugout about what he’s saying. It’s ok to stop the game to toss the manager if he’s crossed the line, but if you’re just irritated with the chirping that’s coming from the dugout, wait until the end of the inning, then go over to the dugout and warn them, explain your call, or say whatever needs to be said. Forty thousand people have paid to attend the game, plus thousands more are watching on television. Nothing that’s being said in the dugout can’t wait until the inning break to be resolved.
To me, this seems like simple respect for the fans who are paying the bill. Furthermore, in a situation like Wednesday night’s game, waiting will give everyone a chance to cool off and hopefully avoid an unnecessary confrontation and ejection.
How about it?
