August 9, 2015
Memorandum for: Matt Williams
Subject: Following up on overuse of setup man
My last memo pointed out that your use of Drew Storen four times in a five-day interval may have contributed to the lack of command that resulted in a game-losing grand slam home run given up to Carlos Gonzalez.
Two days later, Storen was again called on to pitch in the 8th inning, this time in a tie game, and gave up the game-losing runs. If four appearances in five days was excessive, then five appearances in seven days also seems excessive, especially when he had been called on to face 7 batters and throw 23 pitches in his last appearance. Today, again, he exhibited poor command, hitting a batter. I note that there were at least a couple of well rested pitchers available who haven’t been used for several days.
During and after the Mets series, you were severely criticized for failing to use Storen and Jonathan Papelbon when the game was tied. While this criticism was correct, it should also be emphasized that attempting to use these two pitchers in the late innings of every game that is tied or has up to a 3-run lead in the late innings will lead to overuse. It is therefore essential that the first priority should be not overusing or underusing any of your pitchers; the goal of using your best pitchers in high leverage situations has to be subsidiary to this priority.
I’ll also note that if you had refrained from using Storen in Friday’s game, which was not a high leverage situation, he would have been well rested for today’s game, which was indeed a very high leverage situation.
August 7, 2015
Memorandum for: Matt Williams
Subject: Overuse of setup man
Tonight the Nats gave up a 4 to 1 lead in the 8th inning when Drew Storen allowed a one-out walk, then a pair of two-out singles followed by a grand slam hit by Carlos Gonzalez.
Storen was having obvious command problems all inning. The reason for the command problems also seems fairly obvious—he’s had to pitch on 3 of the last 4 days (the 6th, 4th, and 3rd).
Before the 8th inning, both Storen and Tanner Roark were warming up. Bob & FP informed us that Storen would pitch if the lead stayed at 3 runs, whereas Roark would pitch if the Nats scored an additional run. Roark had pitched on 2 of the last 4 days (the 5th and and the 3rd) and had not pitched yesterday. Although a 3-run lead is a save situation and would make Storen eligible to earn a hold, it is not a high leverage situation. It doesn’t make sense to overuse one of your two best relievers just so he can earn a hold.
I recommend that you start worrying more about the potential overuse of your pitchers and less about whether an arbitrary statistical threshold designates this as an inning for the setup man.
August 5, 2015
Memorandum for: Matt Williams
Subject: Letting the pitcher bat in close games
No, I’m not going to blame you for tonight’s loss. The pitchers have to pitch and the hitters have to hit.
But there is one managerial mistake that I’m not going to let slip by. It’s the middle innings, a close game, and the starters’ pitch count is starting to get up there. He’s due to bat and are wondering whether you should you lift him for a pinch hitter.
Simply ask yourself whether, in the next inning, the pitcher were to allow the leadoff hitter to get aboard, you’re going to lift him for a reliever? If the answer is yes, please… PLEASE send in the pinch hitter now. It’s just a really poor percentage move not to use your pinch hitter in this situation.
You’re not the only manager to make this mistake, but in that situation the value of a pinch hitter is just much greater than the value of trying to stretch one more inning from your starter.
The deadline for all-star voting is Thursday, and the teams will be announced soon. To figure out which Nationals deserve to be on the all-star team, each year I put together an NL all-star team. For the last two years, I’ve used a systematic methodology based on statistics.
I won’t go through all the details of the methodology here (you can read the other article if you’re interested), but the main idea is that I give quite a bit of weight to both this season and last season’s performance, plus a little bit of weight to career performance. I want to avoid selecting players who just hit a hot streak for half a season. My method does allow for a few exceptional players to make the team based on a single season of play (Joc Pederson makes my team), but generally I’m looking for those who’ve played very well for at least a year and a half.
Here’s my 2015 all-star team. For position players, I show their weighted runs created (wRC+) over the last season and a half in parentheses; for pitchers I show their ERA– and FIP–:
National League – Starters
C – Buster Posey – Giants (143)
1B – Paul Goldschmidt – Diamondbacks (171)
2B – Dee Gordon – Marlins (108)
3B – Todd Frazier – Reds (136)
SS – Jhonny Peralta – Cardinals (125)
LF – Giancarlo Stanton – Marlins (157) – on DL, replaced by:
LF – Joc Pederson – Dodgers (146)
CF – Andrew McCutchen – Pirates (160)
RF – Bryce Harper – Nationals (159)
DH –Anthony Rizzo – Cubs (159)
SP – Max Scherzer – Nationals (69; 69)
Reserves
C – Jonathan Lucroy – Brewers (118)
C – Derek Norris – Padres (114)
1B – Adrian Gonzalez – Dodgers (134)
2B – Joe Panik – Giants (125)
3B – Nolan Arenado – Rockies (121)
3B – Matt Carpenter – Cardinals (122)
SS – Troy Tulowitzki – Rockies (146)
SS – Brandon Crawford – Giants (112)
OF – A.J. Pollock – Diamondbacks (126)
OF – Jason Heyward – Cardinals (110)
OF – Justin Upton – Padres (133)
OF – Carlos Gomez – Brewers (125)
DH – Freddie Freeman – Braves (141)– on DL, replaced by:
DH – Joey Votto – Reds (139)
SP – Clayton Kershaw – Dodgers (63; 56)
SP – Zack Greinke – Dodgers (67; 80)
SP – Johnny Cueto – Reds (65; 87)
SP – Cole Hamels – Phillies (73; 85)
SP – Jacob deGrom – Mets (70; 71)
SP – Shelby Miller – Braves (86; 111)
RP – Aroldis Chapman – Reds (53; 34)
RP – Trevor Rosenthal – Cardinals (65; 76)
RP – Jonathan Papelbon – Phillies (54; 69)
RP – Kenley Jansen – Dodgers (67; 46)
RP – Francisco Rodriguez – Brewers (65; 100)
Shelby Miller and Jacob deGrom made my team because of the requirement that every team be represented; they’ve been good, but my statistical system would have picked A.J. Burnett and Jake Arrieta ahead of them.
So there are only two Nationals on my team—the best overall player (Bryce Harper) and the best pitcher (Max Scherzer). Several others came close—Jordan Zimmermann and Drew Storen (and Anthony Rendon if he hadn’t been on the disabled list), but Harper and Scherzer were the only Nats to make the cut this time.
Joe Ross pitched his third major league start, an 11-K, 1-run gem against the Pirates. His first three starts have been quite impressive. Among starting pitchers with at least 20 innings pitched, here are the leaders in strikeout-to-walk ratio:
| Name | Team | IP | K% | BB% | K/BB |
| Joe Ross | Nationals | 20.1 | 28.8% | 2.5% | 11.50 |
| Max Scherzer | Nationals | 93.1 | 30.9% | 3.8% | 8.07 |
| Michael Pineda | Yankees | 81.1 | 25.8% | 3.3% | 7.91 |
| Bartolo Colon | Mets | 86.0 | 18.7% | 2.5% | 7.56 |
| Brandon McCarthy | Dodgers | 23.0 | 30.9% | 4.3% | 7.25 |
And here are the leaders in fielding-independent pitching (FIP):
| Name | Team | IP | ERA | xFIP | FIP |
| Joe Ross | Nationals | 20.1 | 2.66 | 2.10 | 1.14 |
| Adam Wainwright | Cardinals | 25.0 | 1.44 | 2.92 | 2.03 |
| Max Scherzer | Nationals | 93.1 | 1.93 | 2.76 | 2.04 |
| Chris Archer | Rays | 95.0 | 2.18 | 2.35 | 2.14 |
| Chris Sale | White Sox | 88.2 | 2.74 | 2.42 | 2.23 |
Well, we all know we shouldn’t rely too much on statistics for pitchers who’ve only faced 80 major league batters (though pitcher strikeout rates do stabilize with pretty small samples). But going as much by what my eyes tell me as the statistics, I think there’s a good chance that Ross may prove to be a better pitcher than either Gio Gonzalez or Doug Fister over the remainder of this season. I think the team has its best chance of winning if they let him stay on the team, rather than sending him back to Harrisburg. Let him stay; if it turns out that these last three starts have been a fluke, we can always send him down later. But give him a chance to pitch for us now and prove the doubters wrong.
How would we use him? Although he could be sent to the bullpen, my own preference is to use him as a starter. While that might mean sending Fister to the bullpen, I think a better option would be to use him in a modified 6-man rotation.
How would that work? Assign Ross to pitch once a week—for example, he starts every Saturday. The other pitchers would pitch on their regular rotation, but they’d get an extra day’s rest when it’s Ross’s turn to pitch. Why do that rather than just plug him into a 5-man rotation? It comes down to work load and innings limits.
Ross has never pitched more than 122 innings or faced more than 524 batters in a season. Most teams don’t want to increase that work load more than about 30 innings (or 25%) in a season. He’s faced 286 batters so far this season. If we want to limit him to about 650 batters over the rest of the season, that would work out to about 15 more starts at about 24 batters per start. I proposed a similar once-a-week schedule for Stephen Strasburg the year of his shutdown; Tango Tiger proposed a similar schedule on his blog.
Maybe Ross will be great; maybe just good; or maybe he’ll need more time in the minors. But given the disappointing state of the Nationals rotation other than Max Scherzer, let’s give him a chance.
