The Nats went 16–14 in May and managed to pick up a game and a half on the 14–15 Mets. The Nats faced a much tougher schedule than they had in April—every team they played in May other than the Tigers ended the month with at least a .500 record (and the Tigers’ winning percentage was .471). The Nats finished the month with a 32–21 record, leading the division by two games over the second place Mets.
The month began with the Nats on the road, playing the third game of a 3-game set with the Cardinals. They won, giving them a sweep over the Cards. Next they faced the world champion Royals in Kansas City, and they took two of three. At that point they had won five of the first six games on a tough 10-game road trip. But their biggest challenge was still ahead of them in Chicago, where they had a 4-game series against the red hot Cubs, who at that point had a 20–6 record.
In the first game Joe Ross pitched well, allowing 2 runs on 5 hits and 2 walks in 6-2/3 innings, but the Nats managed only 2 hits against Cubs starter Hendricks (and 3 altogether) and lost the game 5–2. In the second game, Max Scherzer gave up 4 homers and 7 runs in 5 innings, and the Nats lost 8–6. The third game was a similar story, with Gio Gonzalez giving up 5 runs in 5-2/3 innings, and the Nats losing 8–5. In the final game, facing Cubs ace Jake Arrieta, the Nats finally seemed to have a chance to win, as they took a 3–1 lead into the 7th inning behind Tanner Roark‘s pitching. In the bottom of the 7th, the Cubs picked up two runs to tie it, and the game went to extra innings. The Nats had several opportunities to win. Their leadoff hitter reached base in the 9th and 10th innings, and they managed to load the bases in the 10th and 12th. But they weren’t able to score and Baez hit a walk-off homer in the 13th, with the Nats losing 4–3, the Cubs sweeping the series, and the Nats slipping into second place in the NL East.
The most notable aspect of the series was how Joe Maddon managed to shut down Bryce Harper, who was walked or hit by a pitch in 14 of his 19 plate appearances, including in all 7 of his plate appearances in the final extra-inning game. Ryan Zimmerman, who batted behind Harper, failed to protect Harper as he went 2 for 19 in the series. The ultimate insult came in the 10th and 12th innings of the final game, when Harper was intentionally walked in both innings to load the bases with two outs, only to have Zimmerman make the final out of each inning. Other opponents followed suit, as Harper was walked 15 times in the next 8 games. By that point, Harper’s timing was so messed up, batting only .195 through his first 16 games in May, that opposing pitchers finally began pitching to him again.
After the road trip, the Nats faced the Tigers at home. Stephen Strasburg won the first game as news came out that the Nats had signed him to a 7-year, $175 million contract extension. They lost the second game, but the third game was truly remarkable. Scherzer pitched a complete game and struck out 20 batters, tying record (with Roger Clemens, Kerry Wood, and Randy Johnson) for strikeouts in a 9-inning game. He faced 33 batters and threw 119 pitches, of which 96 were strikes, while allowing 6 hits and no walks. He gave up two home runs, however, making it a close game with the Nationals winning 3–2. The home runs were a persistent problem for Scherzer this month, as he gave up 10 home runs in his 6 starts during May.
The next and final series of the homestand was a 4-game set against the Marlins, including a Saturday day-night doubleheader. They won the first games, regaining the NL East lead. They then split the doubleheader and lost the finale the next day, splitting the series. Between games in the doubleheader, Nats owner Ted Lerner picked up the option for a 2-year extension on GM Mike Rizzo‘s contract, keeping him in Washington through 2018.
The next road trip began in New York with the Nats’ first series against their main rivals, the Mets. The Nats lost the first game—a pitching duel between Scherzer and Noah Syndegaard. They won the second game against an uncharacteristically wild Bartolo Colon and Mets bullpen, drawing 11 walks and 8 hits en route to a 7–1 Nats victory. In the third game, Strasburg pitched well and the Nats beat up on Matt Harvey, winning 9–1. They finished their road trip taking two of three against the Marlins.
Back in Washington, they had another 3-game set against the Mets. This time New York took two of three. This was followed by a 4-game set against the Cardinals, which they split. Back on the road in Philadelphia for the last 2 games of the month, the Nats won both games.
The Nats starters contributed to their success—their 3.70 ERA during May was 6th in the National League, and after park adjustment their ERA was 9% better than the league (an ERA– of 91), which was 5th behind the Cubs, Giants, Dodgers, and Braves. Their fielding independent pitching, or FIP, was Gonzalez struggled with a 5.23 ERA in May, but the other four starters all had ERAs below 4.00.
The relief pitching was outstanding, with the Nats relievers leading the NL in May in ERA (2.76) in ERA– (68), in RE24 (15.75), in FIP (2.82), and in FIP– (71). Their 9 meltdowns was the second lowest total in the NL.
The offense also contributed, with the Nats ranking 4th in the NL in runs with 133 and in weighted runs created (wRC+) with 101. They were 3rd in slugging percentage (.431) and 1st in home runs (43), even while Harper slumped with a .200 average and .363 slugging percentage. Zimmerman, Anthony Rendon, Wilson Ramos, and especially Daniel Murphy made up the slack. The team’s on-base percentage of .327 was 6th in the NL and a 20-point improvement from their April figure.
18–12 (4.43 R/G – 3.67 RA/G)
For the second consecutive month, this award goes to the NL Player of the Month, who this time is Daniel Murphy (.416/.424/.673, 29 G, 7 HR, 17 R, 23 RBI, 1.7 fWAR). (Harper had taken the award in April.)
Most valuable starting pitcher:
Stephen Strasburg (5–0, 3.11 RA/9, 6 G, 37-2/3 IP, 11.9 K/9, .285 opp OBP, 1.0 RA9-WAR).
Most valuable relief pitcher:
Yusmeiro Petit (0–0, 2.08 RA/9, 8 G, 13 IP, 7.6 K/9, .275 opp OBP, 4.22 RE24, 0.3 RA9-WAR, 2 of 5 inherited runners scored, 1 shutdown, 0 meltdowns).
Ben Revere (.170/.225/.266, –0.6 fWAR in 23 games and 102 plate appearances).
Best start this month:
Max Scherzer (May 11, 3–2 win over the Tigers) got 20 strikeouts in a complete game, tying the major league record for strikeouts in a 9-inning game, allowing 2 runs, 6 hits, and no walks, for a game score of 87.
Tanner Roark (May 14, 7–1 loss to the Marlins at home) gave up 7 runs on 8 hits in 5 innings, with 3 walks and 5 strikeouts. His game score was 25.
- Joe Ross (May 5, 5–2 loss to the Cubs in Chicago) gave up 2 runs on 5 hits and 2 walks with 9 strikeouts in 6-2/3 innings (game score 63).
- Max Scherzer (May 17, 2–0 loss to the Mets in New York) gave up 2 runs on 3 hits and 3 walks with 10 strikeouts in 6-1/3 innings (game score 66).
- Tanner Roark (May 25, 2–0 loss to the Mets at home) gave up 2 runs (1 earned) on 5 hits and 2 walks with 5 strikeouts in 7 innings (game score 64).
- Max Scherzer (May 27, 6–2 loss to the Cardinals at home) gave up 5 runs on 3 hits and 5 walks, which unfortunately were all bunched together, while striking out 6 in 7 innings (game score 53).
Jonathan Papelbon (May 8, 4–3 loss to the Cubs in 13 innings in Chicago). It wasn’t the prettiest performance—in two innings he gave up a single, a double, and a walk, and avoided giving up the winning run when Heyward was thrown out at home. But Papelbon did pitch scoreless 11th and 12th innings and gave the Nats opportunities to win, which they unfortunately weren’t able to take advantage of. (Win probability added .263).
Jonathan Papelbon (May 3, 7–6 loss to the Royals in Kansas City). With the Nats leading 6–4, Papelbon was called on to close it out in the bottom of the 9th. He gave up two singles and a stolen base, when Moustakas hit a one-out single to tie the game. After a fly-out and another single, Cain delivered the walk-off run with another single, the fifth in the inning. (WPA –.911)
Clint Robinson (May 9, 5–4 win over the Tigers at home). Called on to pinch hit with one out in the bottom of the 9th, with the bases empty and the score tied 4–4, Robinson hit a walk-off homer (WPA .424).
Jayson Werth (May 21, 3–2 loss to the Marlins in Miami). The Nats had entered the top of the ninth trailing 3–1, but after three singles and a walk the score was 3–2, and the Nats had the bases loaded with no outs. Werth hit a weak grounder to third. Prado stepped on third base to force out Michael A. Taylor, then threw home in time for the catcher to apply the tag to Murphy (WPA –.504). Jose Lobaton followed with a groundout to give the Marlins the win.
There’s an old saying, “You can’t fight city hall.” In baseball, the equivalent is “You can’t fight the umpire.”
In Monday’s game against the Tigers, Bryce Harper was ejected basically because umpire Brian Knight was thin skinned and wanted to make himself the center of the game. When Clint Robinson followed with a walk-off home run and Harper joined the celebration while dropping the f-bomb on the ump, the nation’s media weighed in. And while most of them condemned Harper, some of them also pointed to the arbitrary and unfair nature of Knight’s ejection of Harper that instigated the incident, thereby embarrassing the entire class of umpires. It was inevitable that they would take their revenge on the Nationals.
Their opportunity came in the top of the sixth inning of tonight’s game. Anthony Gose had just singled, loading the bases with the score tied 3 to 3 with one out. The next batter, Andrew Romine, grounded to second baseman Daniel Murphy, who flipped to shortstop Danny Espinosa for the force, but Espinosa’s throw to first was too late for an inning-ending double play, so the Tigers scored the go-ahead run.
The Nats infielders immediately pointed toward Gose, indicating that he had made an illegal slide into second base, and Dusty Baker called for umpire review. Based on the language of the rule, it seemed like an open-and-shut case. The rule says:
If a runner does not engage in a bona fide slide, and initiates (or attempts to make) contact with the fielder for the purpose of breaking up a double play, he should be called for interference under this Rule 6.01. A “bona fide slide” for purposes of Rule 6.01 occurs when the runner: (1) begins his slide (i.e., makes contact with the ground) before reaching the base; (2) is able and attempts to reach the base with his hand or foot; 2016 Official Baseball Rules (PDF)_2016 Official Baseball Rules 3/15/16 2:38 PM Page 70 Rule 6.01(j) to 6.02(a) 71 (3) is able and attempts to remain on the base (except home plate) after completion of the slide; and (4) slides within reach of the base without changing his pathway for the purpose of initiating contact with a fielder.
Gose was clearly not attempting to reach the base and was clearly attempting to break up the double play by forcing Espinosa to move out of his way. But the anonymous New York umpires reviewing the call would not be deterred in their efforts to punish the Nationals. They upheld the call, explaining that although Gose didn’t make a bona fide slide, “his actions did not hinder or impede the fielder.” Which, as F.P. Santangelo ranted, is clearly nonsense – Espinosa had to take an extra step before his throw to avoid Gose plowing into him. How couldn’t that not have hindered and impeded him as a fielder? Furthermore, what’s the point of having a rule against runners making illegal slides if the enforcement of the rule is going to be up to the arbitrary whims of the men in blue?
The umpires’ decision clearly changed the outcome of the game, and it was clearly contrary to the new stated rule, and also contrary to how similar slides have been called previously this year. But when the umpires as a class decide to gang up on a team and make them pay, resistance is futile. The umpires always get the last word. Although I wish the bad umpires could be fired, it’s not going to happen and they’re going to continue protect their own fraternity and to misuse their authority.
The other frustrating episode of tonight’s game came in the eighth inning, when Wilson Ramos singled with one out and the Nats trailing 5 to 4. My immediate thought was that Michael A. Taylor is still available and should pinch run for Ramos, who—as much as we all love him—has to be a leading contender for the title of slowest player in the majors. With two outs, Clint Robinson hit a double and Ramos was thrown out attempting to score from first. After the game, Baker said he was planning to pinch run for Ramos if he reached second. I”ve seen Baker do that a couple of times before and I haven’t understood it. If a pinch runner would be useful scoring from second on a single, wouldn’t he also be useful in scoring from first on a double, going from first to third on a single, preventing the double play, possibly stealing a base, and all the other ways a good runner can help you in the late innings of a close game? IMO, this wasn’t one of Baker’s better decisions.
I’m sorry that I’m late getting this finished and posted – a lot was going on this week.
The Nats’ 16–7 record was their most successful April ever. Of course, they were helped by facing the easiest schedule in baseball. And despite their hot start, they finished the month with only a half-game lead over the Mets, who started the season with a similarly hot 15–7 record.
The season opened on April 4 in Atlanta, where the Nats twice gave up the lead before winning the game 4–3 in 10 innings. Ben Revere was injured in the game and was on the disabled list for the rest of the month. They won the second game of the two-game set 3–1. Returning to Washington for the home opener against the Marlins, Tanner Roark gave up 4 runs (3 of them earned) in 4 innings of a rain-delayed 6–4 loss. After the second game of the series was cancelled due to bad weather, the Nats beat the Marlins 4–2 to split the series. The Nats then hosted the hapless Braves for a 4-game set and swept them.
The Nats then went to Philadelphia, where they won the first two of three games against the Phillies. After that second game, the Nats’ record was 9–1, best in baseball, and the team had a 5-game lead in the NL East. Bryce Harper homered in every game in the Philadelphia series, which along with a homer in the last game of the Braves series gave him homers in four consecutive games, and was later shared Player of the Week honors. His homer in the final game came in an especially critical spot, breaking a tie in the top of the tenth inning. Unfortunately, Jonathan Papelbon wasn’t able to hold the lead and took the loss in the bottom of the tenth for his first blown save. In Miami, the Nats split a 4-game set against the Marlins. In the second game of the series, Jayson Werth hit his 200th career home run as part of the 4 homer, 7 run seventh inning rally by the Nats.
After the Marlins series, the Nats returned home for their first interleague series against the Twins. The Nats swept the series, in which the final game was won 6–5 in the 16th inning on a Chris Heisey walkoff home run. But the Nats bats were stopped by the Phillies, who swept a 3-game series in which the Nats were shut out in the last two games. The month ended with the Nats winning two games in St. Louis against the Cardinals at the start of a challenging 10-game road trip.
After their 9–1 start through April 16, the Nats’ record slowed to 7–6 for the rest of the month, while the Mets started 4–6 but then went 11–1 to draw within a half game of the Nats by the end of the month. According to Fangraphs, the Nats’ odds of winning the division were 40.7% at the beginning of the season, but had slipped to 37.3% by the end of the month.
What went right for the Nats? Mostly the pitching—at 2.28 the team ranked second in the NL in starting pitcher ERA just behind the Cubs, and fourth in fielding independent pitching (FIP) at 2.91, behind the Mets, Phillies, and Cubs. The most surprising aspect of the success of their starting pitching was that it came even though their ace, Max Scherzer, had a disappointing month, with a 4.35 ERA and 4.50 FIP as he gave up 5 home runs in 5 starts.
The relief pitching was also quite successful, which may also have been a surprise. Nats relievers led the NL in ERA at 2.53 and in RE24 with 12.84, and were third in FIP at 3.21. They recorded the second-most shutdowns with 24, and had the second fewest meltdowns with 7.
The excellent pitching made up for an offense that depended heavily on just two highly successful hitters, Bryce Harper and Daniel Murphy. The team’s on-base percentage of .307 was 11th in the NL and their slugging percentage of .384 ranked 9th, while their weighted runs created (wRC+) of 81 ranked 10th. This was despite Harper ranking fourth and Murphy sixth in the league in wRC+ during the month. However, the only Nats hitters besides Harper and Murphy with above average wRC+ for the month were Chris Heisey and Wilson Ramos. The others were generally disappointing.
16–7 (4.04 R/G – 2.61 RA/G)
The award goes to Bryce Harper (.286/.406/.714, 23 G, 9 HR, 16 R, 24 RBI, 1.2 fWAR), the 2015 MVP and April’s NL Player of the Month. Honorable mention goes to Daniel Murphy (.370/.433/.580, 1.0 fWAR).
Most valuable starting pitcher:
Stephen Strasburg (4–0, 2.25 RA/9, 5 G, 36 IP, 10.0 K/9, .267 opp OBP, 1.5 RA9-WAR).
Most valuable relief pitcher:
Shawn Kelley (0–0, 0.00 RA/9, 10 G, 8 IP, 12.4 K/9, .226 opp OBP, 2.80 RE24, 0.5 RA9-WAR, 3 of 8 inherited runners scored).
This award is shared by Clint Robinson (.050/.136/.050, –0.4 fWAR), and Michael A. Taylor (.183/.218/.317, –0.4 fWAR), with dishonorable mention going to Stephen Drew (.125/.160/.250, –0.3 fWAR) and Ryan Zimmerman (.219/.301/.301, –0.3 fWAR).
Best start this month:
Tanner Roark (April 23, 2–0 win over the Twins at home) got 15 strikeouts in 7 innings with no runs, 2 hits, and 3 walks allowed, for a game score of 85. His pitching performance was so unusual and unexpected that it led to, for example, this article by Owen Watson of Fangraphs. Honorable mention goes to Stephen Strasburg (April 19, 7–0 win over the Marlins in Miami) who pitched 8 shutout innings, giving up 3 hits and 2 walks with 10 strikeouts (game score of 84).
Tanner Roark (April 7, 6–4 loss to the Marlins in the Nationals’ home opener) gave up 4 runs on 9 hits in 4 innings, with 3 walks and 3 strikeouts. His game score was 30.
- Gio Gonzalez (April 27, 3–0 loss to the Phillies at home) gave up 2 runs on 5 hits and 3 walks with 5 strikeouts in 6-1/3 innings (game score 59).
- Max Scherzer (April 11, 6–4 win over the Braves at home) gave up 4 runs on 6 hits and 3 walks with 6 strikeouts in 6 innings (game score 47).
Blake Treinen (April 12, 2–1 win over the Braves at home). He entered in the top of the eighth with the scored tied 0–0, one out, and runners on first and second. After allowing a single to load the bases, he got a double play to get out of the inning without a run scoring. The Nats scored two in the bottom of the eighth on a Harper double. In the ninth, Treinen struck out the first two batters he faced before giving up a walk (Win probability added .210). Felipe Rivero was brought in to get the final out, and Rivero gave up a double with a run scoring before he struck out the final batter.
Jonathan Papelbon (April 17, 3–2 loss to the Phillies in Philadelphia). With the scored tied 1–1, the game had gone to extra innings. Harper hit a solo home run in the top of the tenth, and Papelbon came in to get the save in the bottom of the tenth. With one out, he gave up a double to Bourjos. He got a second out, then gave up a game-tying single to Blanco, followed by a walk-off double surrendered to Galvis. (WPA –.809)
This award is shared by two hitters in the same game, who made very different types of hits, but with similar results. In the 16-inning marathon that the Nats played against the Twins on April 24, the Nats were trailing 4–3 in the bottom of the ninth when Bryce Harper led off the inning with a game-saving and game-tying home run (WPA .441). But that wasn’t the highest win probability added of any Nats plate appearance that afternoon. In the 15th inning, the Twins had scored another run and the Nats were trailing 5–4. With 2 outs, Danny Espinosa walked and then stole second. The Nats bench was out of pinch hitters, so Oliver Perez came to bat. Bizarrely, he laid down a two-out bunt, hoping to beat it out for a hit. The Twins catcher, JR Murphy, reached the ball but turned and threw it away, allowing Espinosa to score from second and tying the game (WPA .466).
Jose Lobaton (April 24, the same 16-inning, 6–5 win over the Twins at home). In the bottom of the tenth inning with the score tied 4–4, Lobaton came to bat with one out and runners on first and second, and grounded into a rall-killing double play (WPA –.204).
It takes me a while to observe a manager, see how he handles various situations, and get a sense of how he deals with stress. So it’s way too early for me to evaluate Dusty Baker. But I do see some patterns emerging, some of which i like, others not so much.
We’re only three weeks into the season, but he’s already given almost all of the regulars a day off. I’ve frequently argued in favor of giving regulars—especially the older ones—periodic days off. This not only helps the player regroup during a long season, but also helps keep the bench fresh by giving them some at bats and time in the field. In contrast, Matt Williams tended to run out the same lineup week after week, giving bench players little opportunity to play.
Another contrast is that both Williams and Davey Johnson tended to set their bullpens an inning at a time, whereas Baker tends to be more willing to use a reliever for four or five outs, not necessarily starting or stopping at the beginning and end of an inning. I like Baker’s approach—again, it’s less rigid and gives more opportunities for getting the right match-ups. Baker also seems sensitive to giving his relievers rest when they’ve been used repeatedly.
My biggest complaint about Baker so far was for sticking with Stephen Strasburg too long yesterday. I’ve repeatedly complained that I don’t like letting the starter hit (rather than using a pinch hitter) late in a close game when it’s clear that the pitcher has at most one inning left. Yesterday, at the end of 7 innings Strasburg had thrown 90 pitches, but the game was tied and he had faced 25 batters, which meant he was approaching the ominous fourth time through the lineup. Almost all pitchers have worse results the fourth time facing a batter; for example, Strasburg’s career OPS allowed the fourth time through (albeit in only 57 plate appearances) is .868 (compared with .630 the third time through).
My other complaint is Baker sticking with Michael A. Taylor as the leadoff batter, a role that he’s clearly not suited for. It’s true that the Nats don’t have a classic leadoff man, but I’d probably ask Anthony Rendon or Jayson Werth to lead off.
The Nats have had some early luck, but it’s hard not to feel good about this season.
This winter it’s been tough for me to get excited about the Nats and baseball. Several long-time favorite players left via free agency. The team pursued several big-name players, but failed to land them. The main moves they did make—trading away Yunel Escobar and signing Daniel Murphy, trading away Drew Storen and signing Shawn Kelley, picking up Ben Revere—probably improved the team only slightly. The player I earnestly hoped they would trade, Jonathan Papelbon, is back. Meh.
Only in the last couple of weeks have I started warming up to this year’s Nats. It helps that they have the best player, and probably the second-best pitcher in the National League. And even though we all know spring training statistics are meaningless (or are they?), it still helped me feel better about the team to see them go 18–4 in the Grapefruit League. And even though this is probably the least impressive team the Nats have fielded in the last five years, playing in a weak division they still look to be quite competitive. Finally, a week ago I relented and bought opening day tickets.
With Bryce Harper (9.5 fWAR last year) and Max Scherzer (6.4 fWAR & RA9WAR) returning, the Nats have a solid foundation, even assuming some regression. (FanGraphs projects Harper at 7.3 fWAR for 2016 and Scherzer at 5.8.) Some of that regression should be offset by regression in the other direction from some of last year’s poor performers. For example, Jayson Werth‘s –0.3 fWAR from last season is projected to increase to +1.0 this season, and Wilson Ramos is projected to increase from 0.4 to 1.6.
But even in the NL East, the Nats will need more than Harper and Scherzer to secure a title. The key players in my view are Anthony Rendon and Stephen Strasburg. We need Rendon to play more like the 6.5 WAR, .186 ISO player we saw in 2014, rather than the injured 0.9 WAR, .100 ISO player we saw last season. And we need Strasburg to pitch like he did in the last two months last season, 92 strikeouts and only 8 walks in 66-1/3 innings, good for a 1.90 ERA and an 8–2 record. This spring he’s looked like he’s ready to return to that form.
This Nats team certainly also has its flaws. In particular, Ryan Zimmerman at first base, Revere and Michael A. Taylor platooning in center field, Ramos at catcher, and Werth in left field all project to be below average players. Tanner Roark as the fifth starter is a bit of a mystery—I wouldn’t be surprised to see him pitch terribly or to see him pitch very well. We’ve certainly seen both over the last two seasons, and the Nats need to find out which pitcher he is.
The good thing about a team with holes is that they can fill some of them with mid-season deals. One of Mike Rizzo‘s problems last season was that he didn’t think he had any holes and expected everything to be alright once everyone was back and healthy. So the only trade-deadline deal he made was the infamous Papelbon trade. The Mets, in contrast, recognized last July that they had several holes and set about making themselves better. Their second-half improvement wasn’t mainly due to their mid-season acquisitions—several of their players also started playing better—but they do show how it’s not always a bad thing for a team to have a few holes. Nevertheless, I think it’s generally better for a team to fill their holes during the off-season rather than waiting until the middle of the season to do so, and I wish the Nats had been more aggressive this winter.
My biggest question from this offseason, though, is why are the Nationals’ billionaire owners insisting that in order for any free-agent player to sign with them, the player needs to lend them money? Yes, deferred compensation is exactly that—the player receives part of his compensation as an IOU, meaning that the player is lending money to the owner. If the Lerners are that hard up for cash, why don’t they just go to a bank for a loan, rather than hitting up the players? I mean, it’s fine if a player (such as Scherzer) wants to lend them money, and there are even tax advantages to the player. But as far as I’m aware there aren’t any tax advantages to the employer. So why are the Lerners insisting that any player who wants to play for the team has to make them a loan? This odd insistence seems to have cost the Nats several excellent potential players this winter.
“Links to remember” are links to articles that are worth re-reading months after they were written, or to video of memorable plays. A long time ago I used to post them every month or two, but now I’m down to posting them once a year. Here they are (albeit three months late)—my favorite links for the 2015 season:
The most important story of the year was the emergence of Bryce Harper as the MVP and one of the best players in the game. So a lot of articles were written about Harper. Here are a couple that were especially memorable:
- One of the earliest things we saw in 2015 was the Harper was more disciplined and taking a lot more walks. Ben Lindbergh of Grantland recognized that he might be a different and much better hitter in 2015.
- As Jeff Sullivan of FanGraphs noted, Harper continued to adapt his hitting style as the year went along.
- At season’s end, Sullivan reflected on the historical significance of Harper’s breakout season.
After Harper, the 2015 season will sadly be remembered for the failures of its bullpen and the ill-fated trade for Jonathan Papelbon:
- As usual, the brilliant Joe Posnanski of NBC Sports nailed it early, identifying the Papelbon trade as the “worst trade of the season.”
- After repeated bullpen failures against the Mets, David Schoenfield of ESPN sees bullpen chokes in big games as a legacy of this generation’s Nationals.
- Lots of articles were written about the Papelbon-Harper choking incident. As usual, Grant Brisbee of SB Nation is brilliant in explaining the unwritten rule that Harper may have broken.
- Craig Calcaterra of NBC Sports observes that the incident went back to Harper’s comments a week earlier about Papelbon throwing at Machado and says that Harper showed some real courage by speaking up about a teammate’s dangerous actions.
- Posnanski sums it up: “… the Nationals are not a family, nothing close. They are a failed experiment, and soon Washington will be broken apart and another team with different players will be built in its place.”
Finally, a couple of analyses of what went wrong for the Nationals:
- In early August, just after the Nats gave up first place to the Mets (for good, as it turned out), Brisbee gave a pretty good summary of what was going right for the Mets and wrong for the Nats.
- A month later, Sullivan provided a statistical post mortem on the Nats’ season.
I like to end these with links to videos of some of the year’s most memorable plays:
- Ryan Zimmerman made a beautiful diving catch of a bunt.
- In perhaps the biggest comeback in Nationals’ history, on April 28 Dan Uggla capped a 13–12 victory over the Braves with a ninth-inning go-ahead home run.
- We started to realize that it would be a special season for Bryce Harper when he hit three home runs in an early May game against the Marlins.
- Entering a game after Harper was ejected, Michael A. Taylor hit a ninth-inning go-ahead grand-slam against the Diamondbacks.
- A couple of weeks later, Taylor made a great diving catch against the Cubs
- It was also a special season for Max Scherzer, as he pitched a no-hitter (and near-perfect game) against the Pirates. Most no-hitters feature a great play, and Danny Espinosa supplied one to keep the no-hitter alive on a ground ball hit into right field.
- In an unusual play, Anthony Rendon grabs a deflected ball and manages to get it to Felipe Rivero for the out.
- Here’s video of the ugly Harper-Papelbon choking incident.
- Before the season ended, there was some happier news. On the next-to-last day of the season, Scherzer pitched his second no-hitter and struck out 17 Mets.
The first part of assessing the Nats’ needs for this winter is assessing where they currently stand. The Fangraphs site has posted projections and depth charts from Steamer; presumably other projections, such as ZIPS, will be coming later. These depth charts, of course, only include current rosters, so the numbers will change as free agents are signed and trades are made. But at this early stage, the Nats look pretty good—they show the Nationals with 42.6 WAR, which is third in MLB (behind the Dodgers and Cubs) and slightly ahead of the Mets, who are projected with 40.6 WAR.
Let’s take a look at how the relative rankings and projected WAR shake out by position. In this table, each entry represents the team’s relative ranking among the 30 MLB teams (for example, the Nats’ catchers rank # 20), along with the total projected WAR at the position in parentheses (2.2 for the Nats’ catchers):
|C||# 20 (2.2)||# 7 (3.1)||# 24 (2.0)|
|1B||# 18 (1.5)||# 13 (1.9)||# 28 (0.4)|
|2B||# 21 (1.4)||# 8 (2.7)||# 15 (2.0)|
|SS||# 12 (2.1)||# 19 (1.8)||# 30 (0.7)|
|3B||# 6 (3.8)||# 13 (3.1)||# 21 (2.2)|
|LF||# 14 (1.7)||# 8 (2.1)||# 4 (2.4)|
|CF||# 24 (1.3)||# 16 (2.0)||# 10 (3.0)|
|RF||# 1 (6.9)||# 10 (2.1)||# 2 (5.6)|
|SP||# 1 (18.0)||# 2 (17.9)||# 20 (10.5)|
|RP||# 18 (2.8)||# 17 (2.8)||# 8 (3.4)|
The depth charts assume that Yunel Escobar will play second base, Trea Turner will be the main shortstop (with Danny Espinosa backing him up), and that Anthony Rendon will play third.
A few notes on these projections:
- For the first time in several years, the Nats project to be below average at several positions: catcher (Wilson Ramos and Jose Lobaton), first base (Ryan Zimmerman), second base (Escobar), center field (Michael A. Taylor), and relief pitcher. In contrast, the unique characteristic of the Nationals going into the last three seasons is that they were projected to be at least average at almost every position. It didn’t always work out that way in practice, but at least on paper their lineup and pitching looked great, which is why they were usually picked as pre-season favorites.
- The expensive contracts due to Jayson Werth and Zimmerman make it challenging to improve at those two positions. Even though their performance may be slipping below average, it hasn’t collapsed to the point where the Nats are likely to want to try to dump their contracts.
- The sole reason that the Nats are still slightly favored over the Nats is one player, Bryce Harper. Outside of Harper, the Mets and Nats are remarkably closely matched, with the edge going to the Mets at several positions (especially second base).
- I was a bit surprised that the Nats’ starting pitching is still (slightly) favored over the Mets, but Steamer projects Max Scherzer as the # 3 pitcher in baseball next season, and Stephen Strasburg as # 10. In contrast, Harvey, deGrom, and Syndergaard are projected as # 12, 13, and 20.
- The projections really like two Nationals rookies—Trea Turner (1.7 WAR in 455 projected PA) and Lucas Giolito (1.2 WAR in 83 projected IP).
- Where do the projections suggest the Nats need to improve? Center field looks like a primary target. The projections just don’t see Taylor hitting well enough to be more than a fourth outfielder. In a follow-up post, I’ll look more closely at Taylor and the Nats’ free agent and trade options for center field.